This was the day before the season of lies....The season of control...
Questions For NTSB/FBI Regarding Flight Data Recorder Information
Analysis of American 77
Phone call to NTSB regarding conflicts.
- The current FDR shows 480' MSL True Altitude, too high to hit the light poles. What are your findings of True Altitude at end of data recording 09:37:44.
- Why did you provide a Flight Data Recorder that shows the aircraft too high without a side letter of explanation? How did you come to your conclusion.
- What is the vertical speed at end of data recording :44. How did you come to your conclusion.
- What is the Absolute Altitude and end of data recording? How did you come to your conclusion.
- Why does the csv file show the altimeter being set in the baro cor column on the descent through FL180, but the animation altimeter does not show it being set?(This is a blatant cover-up to confuse the average layman in hopes no one would adjust for local pressure to get True Altitude. Too bad for them we caught it).
- Why do the current G Forces for the last minute of data correspond to the changes in vertical speed, yet at end of data :44-:45 it shows an increase in vertical speed never accounting for any type of level off to be level with the lawn as shown in the DoD video?
- Do you have any video showing a clear impact and/or of the plane on its approach to impact?
- Why does your animation show a flight path north of the reported flight path?
- Why are there no system indication of any impact with any object up to and after :44?
- Why does the csv file and animation show a right bank when the official report requires a left bank to be consistent with physical damage to the generator?
- How did you come to the conclusion of 09:37:45 as the official impact time?
- What is the exact chain of custody of the FDR? What date/time was it found? Where exactly was it found? Please provide documentation and names.
- Why does the hijack timeline show a 3 min interval for hijacking to take place?
- Why was Capt. Burlingame reported to have not followed protocol for the Common Strategy prior to 9/11?Check out the full analysis here...
Listen to the lyrics...
In plain talk, we live in an empire built of lies. The empire is built by industrialists whose only objective is profit. Unlike empire builders of the past these "emperors" build in secret. They hide behind the American people. The result is that we, the people, appear to support what they do. Therefore, we the people, suffer the consequences.
Richard Bruce "Dick" Cheney[1] (born January 30, 1941) served as the 46th Vice President of the United States from 2001 to 2009 in the administration of George W. Bush.
From 1995 until 2000, he served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Halliburton, a Fortune 500 company and market leader in the energy sector.
Cheney's record as CEO was subject to some dispute among Wall Street analysts; a 1998 merger between Halliburton and Dresser Industries attracted the criticism of some Dresser executives for Halliburton's lack of accounting transparency.[47] During Cheney's tenure, Halliburton changed its accounting practices regarding revenue realization of disputed costs on major construction projects.[48] Cheney resigned as CEO of Halliburton on July 25, 2000. As vice president, he argued that this step removed any conflict of interest. Cheney's net worth, estimated to be between $30 million and $100 million, is largely derived from his post at Halliburton, as well as the Cheneys gross income of nearly $8.82 million.[49]
In 1997, along with Donald Rumsfeld, William Kristol and others, Cheney founded the Project for the New American Century, a neoconservative U.S. think tank whose self-stated goal is to "promote American global leadership."[50] He was also part of the board of advisors of the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA) before becoming vice president.[35]
Now Common Sense = Comic Insanity
While honor and patriotism holds us hostage overseas...
It's Winter in America...
Council on Foreign Relations
Fareed Zakaria
When he wrote the following words, Zakaria was Managing Editor of Foreign Affairs, the official magazine of the CFR.
He said:
Maintaining a long-term American presence in the gulf would be difficult in the absence of a regional threat…. If Saddam Hussein did not exist, we would have to invent him. He is the linchpin of American policy in the Mideast. Without him, Washington would be stumbling in the dessert sands…. If not for Saddam, would the Saudi royal family, terrified of being seen as an American protectorate (which in a sense it is), allow American troops on their soil? Would Kuwait house more than 30,000 pieces of American combat hardware, kept in readiness should the need arise? Would the king of Jordan, the political weather vane of the region, allow the Marines to conduct exercises within his borders?
… The end of Saddam Hussein would be the end of the anti-Saddam coalition. Nothing destroys an alliance like the disappearance of the enemy.
“Thank Goodness for A Villain,” by Fareed Zakaria, Newsweek, Sept. 16, 1996, p. 43. (Article in Internet archive.)
Let's get lost in the music....
CAN YOU DO THE MATH?
Posts
